An Ode To The Role Of Big Government

In the wake of hurricane Sandy, a vision of the federal government as our savior has emerged. This romanticized vision of the benefits of an ever expanding government taking control to affect everything, from our waistlines, to breast feeding, to mandatory vaccinations, to how we live and die needs to be considered. What price are we paying to allow the government to extend far beyond its role of protecting us from enemies by descending into a nanny state?

For some, the sight of people standing in lines for hours for gasoline or those huddled in their homes with limited or no supplies of food and water provide an answer to this question. For them, dependence on the government has led to potentially tragic vulnerability. We as a people have voluntarily ceded our individual authority and responsibility to a system that is designed to treat us as a collective group of children who are incapable of making decisions for the good of ourselves and of our families.

For others, fear is the predominant driving force that encourages them to remain passive in the name of safety while freedom to speak, think and strive to achieve one’s God given talent is systematically stripped away.

Does the good of the many really outweigh the needs of the few when we are moving ever more rapidly towards creating a society that is increasingly more petty, selfish and small minded in the name of ‘fairness’ and ‘spreading the wealth around’?

Perhaps if the government would actually take measures that would protect us from harm it would be worth the compromise. How about some real beneficial measures:

  • Instead of the endless campaign against obesity with the useless moratorium on big gulps and large servings of popcorn at the movies, how about removing the subsidies which encourage the addition of high fructose corn syrup, which plays an essential role in the rise of obesity by placing it in hundreds of products that Americans consume daily.
  • Instead of watching the cancer rates rise while spending increasing amounts of money on treatment leading to exploding healthcare costs, how about placing a moratorium on genetically modified foods and aspartame which studies show are potentially toxic.
  • Instead of expanding no child left behind policies that have locked public school children in a bloated, wasteful, ineffective system that prides itself on fostering mediocrity, especially among the poor and minority children as evidenced by the recent decision of a Florida state board of education to set academic goals on the basis of race, perhaps it is time to give the power back to parents, teachers and the children who are left unable to compete successfully in society.

The chest thumping about the wonders of FEMA and the efficiency of the federal government leave lingering doubts when we think back to the people affected by hurricane Katrina who are still living in formaldehyde laced trailers or about the fiasco surrounding the oil spill in the Gulf.

The country is most definitely at a critical crossroads. Instead of drawing on emotions that encourage the divide and conquer strategy leading people to vote against a candidate because of hatred for their race, sex, or economic status, how about taking a step back, and voting for the interests of you, your family, and for the good of our nation.

 

Posted in Medical care, politics of medicine | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Medicare Fact vs. Fiction

For those who think Medicare is a sacred program that needs to be saved, there are some disturbing truths which are being conveniently swept under the rug in the name of politics. Medicare now exists in name only. Over the past decade it has morphed into a bloated, bankrupt system that has fooled seniors into thinking that the money they put into the system would be spent on their healthcare needs. In fact, the money that has been put into the Medicare trust fund has been steadily raided by Congress to use for everything except the health of seniors. Couple this with the fact that there are more people becoming eligible for Medicare while the labor force used to fund it is shrinking, and you have conditions that mix to form the perfect recipe for the Ponzi scheme that it has become.

The answer to the problem has been a steady course of politics as usual. Both parties have been complicit in kicking the can down the road. The only difference has been the rhetoric used to justify their behavior.  On one hand, the Democrats have sought to demonize the Republicans during election cycles by bringing up the boogeyman of vouchers while enacting the Affordable Care Act which removes over 700 billion dollars in order to set up the infrastructure of Obamacare – which in reality is a process that will remove that money directly from patient care (517 billion dollars from part A which comes from the Medicare hospital trust fund, and 247 billion dollars from part B which comes from the supplemental Medicare insurance trust fund). On the other hand, the Republicans have failed to explain to the American people why the current system is not sustainable while doing nothing to help fix the situation in the hopes that they can use the lack of activity to their advantage to gain power in the next election cycle.

While both sides have been fiddling, Medicare as we know it continues to burn. Any physician that still takes Medicare will tell you that Medicare ‘as we know it’ is already gone. Neither side has had the guts to admit that they were instrumental in causing this failure to happen.

The truth is this….Medicare is going bankrupt and the government knows it. Policies and procedures have been put in place systematically to limit care, limit benefits, and foist more of the cost onto third parties such as AARP and private insurance companies through Medicare advantage, while making seniors pay more in co-payments for the privilege in the short term. It can be argued that the ultimate goal is to have the entire country eventually pay for it as the ‘Medicare-for-all’ scheme – which is wrapped in the Trojan horse known as Obamacare.

  1.  Fiction:  Seniors will be able to keep their physician under Obamacare

              Fact:   Physicians are opting out of Medicare, both increasing the time it takes to see a physician and breaking long term relationships between doctors and their patients affecting the quality of care.

  1. Fiction:  The quality of care will improve

             Fact:    Under Obamacare (beginning October 1st), hospitals will be fined for readmitting a patient for the same medical problem within 30 days after discharge. This pressure on the hospital will have unintended consequences. It will pit the hospital’s financial interests against the patient’s interests. For example, patients with chronic diseases such as heart disease and chronic lung ailments who relapse routinely will be treated as outpatients for as long as possible before admission to avoid fines. Coupled with payments to hospitals that are based on diagnostic related group codes (DRGs) that pay for a certain illness based on the number of days a patient remains in the hospital, there will be a push to avoid inpatient admissions on the one hand, while discharging the patient as quickly as possible on the other. This is a recipe for patients to become more sick before they are admitted making their outcome more tenuous.

  1. Fiction:  The patient and their family will make the healthcare decisions

            Fact:   Under Obamacare, there are panels empowered to decide what constitutes standards of care (evidenced based medicine). These panels will decide how a disease is treated and will encompass everything from what medications will be allowed to be used, to how long it should take for a patient to respond to treatment. The doctor and the patient will have no say and individualized care will be a thing of the past. Since cost will become the overriding factor – palliative care and hospice will be encouraged for those who have diseases which are deemed to be too expensive to treat, or the prognosis is poor.

 The meme of Medicare as the template for universal healthcare as the direction which the country should move because it will provide better, more comprehensive and cheaper healthcare is not true. Welcome to the world of Obamacare were centralized planning applied to medicine places the good of the collective over  the rights of the individual who is deemed to be too ignorant to make his or her own healthcare decisions. In short, the answer to healthcare is not more government intervention…it is less.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Healthcare reform, Medical care, politics of medicine | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Obamacare Unmasked

When Massachusetts Governor Patrick signed new legislation requiring that all healthcare providers, in order to be licensed, register with a state board with the power to rewrite provider contracts with insurance companies; mandate what fees providers could charge; and punish physicians with a $500,000 fine for ‘spending too much money on their patients’, it became clear where the Affordable Care Act will eventually lead. It was never about affordable and accessible healthcare. One only has to look at what has happened in Massachusetts  (increased healthcare costs, limited access for patients, and the destruction of independent physicians dedicated to individualized patient care) to know that it was unsustainable. Why would this system be the template for Obamacare…unless the ultimate goal is a centralized quasi corporate healthcare system designed to transfer independence and power from doctors and patients to the government via regulations and compliance. Most Americans probably never realized that the much touted transfer of wealth was not going to be to those in the middle class, but instead would be taken from the middle class in taxes raised by Obamacare in order to enrich cronies like AARP, Big Pharma, hospitals and the medical insurance industry who advocated for passing the bill. Now that it has passed and we know what is in it, physicians must decide if they will honor their Hippocratic Oath and stop participating in a system which forces them through fear and coercion  to act against the interests of their patients before they have no choice.

Posted in Press release | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Nanny State Medicine Can Be Hazardous To Your Health

Mayor Bloomberg’s ban on large soft drinks, trans fats , salt, and now the assault on a new mother’s right to choose how to feed her baby is a stark reminder that whoever pays has the power to control. It is no mistake that these overall meaningless rules are an attempt to control behavior. They are trial balloons sent up to see how far the American public will allow themselves to be pushed before they say enough.  Now that the Affordable Healthcare Act has passed, we can all look forward to the government deciding what services will be covered – after all under Medicaid and Medicare the government is footing the bill, and private insurance companies follow their lead.  In the era of healthcare under the Affordable Care Act, cost will become the driving force, and ultimately it will be the government that will decide who lives and who dies.

Posted in Medical care, politics of medicine, Press release | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

The Antidote To The Affordable Care Act Is Non-Participation

Now that the Supreme Court has upheld The Affordable Care Act the final piece of the puzzle is in place. We will begin the inevitable slide to the end of patient driven healthcare – individualized medicine led by independent doctors in consultation with their patients.

In order to understand where we are now and more importantly know what needs to be done to get out of this situation it is imperative to understand how this started.

The rise of insurance companies has been carefully cultivated as early as 1971 when the Rand Corporation funded by The US Department of Health, Education and Welfare developed and ran a study known as the Rand health Insurance Experiment. The conclusions found that increasing patient costs via cost-sharing (making patients responsible for 25%, 50% or 95% of their medical costs through co-insurance, deductibles) with a maximum out-of-pocket expense of $1000 led to reduced “overutilization.” but more importantly it led to reduced “appropriate or needed” medical care. This was a concrete example of the detrimental effect that removal of the free market system would have on the delivery of healthcare to patients.

The theory that controlling patient behavior could control costs without consequences is fundamentally flawed.  In 2012 we find ourselves in the position of patients now having higher out-of–pocket costs yet healthcare costs are continuing to spiral out of control. A rising number of patients now find themselves in the untenable position of having health insurance, but being unable to afford to use it. The Obamacare mandate exacerbates this by forcing Americans to buy into a system that has the power to deny recommended treatment based on what an insurance company deems “inappropriate or unnecessary.” Treatment is not based on what is determined by the doctor and patient, but instead it is based on what actuaries deem to be most cost effective for the insurance company. The government placing punitive constraints on Americans based on the welfare of private corporate interest smacks of cronyism at best and fascism at worst.

Those who support ‘Medicare for all’ as the panacea either know nothing about how damaging government has been to the delivery of quality healthcare, or they simply don’t care. In short, those who think Obamacare is the advent of socialized medicine need to look closely at Medicare. It was part of the Social Security Amendment (HR6675) passed in 1965. It was set up as socialized medicine for senior citizens. Like Obamcare, it was crafted by bureaucrats, politicians and special interests without the input of patients or doctors. Under the guise of beneficence it forced working Americans to pay into it, conscripted doctors, and over the last forty-six years it has become bloated and wasteful promoting the concentration of money and power in the hands of favored players such as hospitals and insurance companies at the expense of physicians and patients. One only needs to look at the state of medicine now to see this. Initial examples include: 1) the use of the diagnosis related group (DRG) which drives how much a hospital will be paid for a particular disease and therefore affects the length of time a Medicare patient can stay in the hospital; and 2) The Medicare Payment Advisory Committee (MedPAC ) passed in 1997, an advisory panel advising Congress on what should be paid under Medicare. Due to the inevitable creeping of government control under Obamacare this has morphed into the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) which has the power to independently set Medicare payment and coverage guidelines with Congress only able to reverse the rules with a supermajority (courtesy of an amendment by Senator Harry Reid). The IPAB is essentially the rationing board (see page 18, 27). For those who think this only applies to Medicare don’t worry, it will eventually affect those with private insurance since private insurers routinely adopt Medicare guidelines for coverage and payment.

Where does this leave doctors and patients? If they don’t take a stand they will both be servants forced into a system that strips patient privacy and choice while forcing doctors to practice collectivist medicine sacrificing individualized patient care.

The Affordable Care Act forces doctors to ask themselves whether they will honor their sacred Hippocratic oath to do no harm or serve the interests of a government that mandates that cost control is more important than an individual’s right to determine the course of their healthcare. Dr. Curtis W. Caine beautifully sums up the argument for non-participation in a system that is unsustainable economically, and is both morally and ethically bankrupt.

 It is important to recognize that the system will not work without doctors and patients. Instead of depending on Congress to repeal Obamacare, doctors and patients need to work together. These are some steps that doctors and patients can take to regain their freedom:

  1.  Physicians can stop participating in Medicaid and Medicare Under current Medicare/Medicaid guidelines doctors are treated as guilty until proven innocent. Between physicians being being targeted for fraud, waste and abuse (a felony), and recovery audits which claw back money for services already rendered it makes it very difficult to practice good medicine while always looking over your shoulder.
  2. Physicians who plan to stop participating should initiate conversations with their patients about why they have chosen to put patient care above all else.
  3. Medicare patients who have physicians who no longer participate should have a conversation about costs. They will find that many physicians are willing to significantly discount services.
  4. Patients who have insurance with high deductibles and co-insurances should consider foregoing their insurance for routine visits and tests and go to independent physicians that offer fee-for-service. These doctors are likely to offer significantly discounted services. In addition, using free standing facilities (i.e., non hospital based labs, surgery centers, and radiology facilities) can offer significant discounts.
  5.  If you are healthy, consider getting catastrophic coverage and add supplemental insurance (e.g., AFLAC). Most healthy patients see a doctor 1-2 times a year and the average yearly cost is about $400 dollars. Depending on where you live, the average yearly premium is ($2,200-$4500) for an individual and ($5000-$11,200) for a family with a further $3000 deductible and $5000 deductible respectively. For plans with no deductible costs of premiums can be significantly higher. It may be more advantageous to buy a low premium/high deductable policy and save money monthly towards your own private health savings account (for example saving $300 per month would mean $3600 to spend any way you wanted without the risk of denials).
  6.  If you can’t get into a doctor and have a non life threatening problem consider going to an urgent care. Get to know the urgent care centers in your area. Many are now staffed by ER trained physicians and offer excellent care at a fraction of the price of going to a hospital based ER with a significantly shorter waiting time.

 The healthcare system is broken, but The Affordable Care Act is not the solution. Instead of depending on Congress and waiting for an election to bring change, it is up both doctors and patients to work together to take back our power.

 

Posted in Healthcare reform, Medical care, politics of medicine | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Boxing, Wrestling, And Now The Affordable Care Act: Is The Fix In?

As I was listening to the Supreme Court’s decision, I went from the feeling of euphoria and vindication to utter disbelief. I haven’t felt this way since watching the recent Pacquiao fight. The Affordable Care Act was upheld because the bill was based on Congress’ ability to levy taxes? There were no taxes mentioned in the bill, and for the past two years advocates of Obamacare swore that the tenets of the bill were not based on taxing Americans – what a lie.

Now that this malignant law has passed, we are about to learn the extent of the disease that will ultimately kill the American system of healthcare (by destroying the doctor patient relationship on the one hand and eliminating both the doctors’ freedom to treat, and patients’ freedom to choose treatment options on the other).  For a party that purports to be the savior of the middle class and working poor in this country, the Democrats have crafted and passed a law that has saddled those very people with the largest tax hike this country has ever seen.  It is funny how Congress carved themselves out of it. For those who thought they were going to get good healthcare they are in for a rude awakening. The Americans for tax reform highlights 20 new or higher taxes that will affect American families and small businesses. Read more at  http://www.atr.org/tax-hikes-obamacare-scotus-rule-a6996). Below they describe some examples of this bill which will directly affect the quality, access and or costs of healthcare and are nothing but a middle finger to the American people:

Tax on Innovator Drug Companies ($22.2 bil/Jan 2010): $2.3 billion annual tax on the industry imposed relative to share of sales made that year. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,971-1,980

This will likely affect patient access to innovative treatments because the cost of bringing new medications will increase.

 Medicine Cabinet Tax ($5 bil/Jan 2011): Americans no longer are able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin). Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,957-1,959

This is simply a gift to the Pharmaceutical industry since you only have access to the most expensive option. This is exacerbated by the inability to import cheaper drugs.

Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax ($86.8 bil/Jan 2013): Current law and changes:

Bill: PPACA, Reconciliation Act; Page: 2000-2003; 87-93

Translated = more taxes for middle income families

Raise “Haircut” for Medical Itemized Deduction from 7.5% to 10% of AGI ($15.2 bil/Jan 2013): Currently, those facing high medical expenses are allowed a deduction for medical expenses to the extent that those expenses exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI). The new provision imposes a threshold of 10 percent of AGI. Waived for 65+ taxpayers in 2013-2016 only. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994-1,995

This will increase healthcare costs for individuals who have increased healthcare costs.

15. Elimination of tax deduction for employer-provided retirement Rx drug coverage in coordination with Medicare Part D ($4.5 bil/Jan 2013) Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994

This negates the “closing of the donut hole” and raises costs for seniors

Excise Tax on Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans ($32 bil/Jan 2018): Starting in 2018, new 40 percent excise tax on “Cadillac” health insurance plans ($10,200 single/$27,500 family). Higher threshold ($11,500 single/$29,450 family) for early retirees and high-risk professions. CPI +1 percentage point indexed. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,941-1,956

This affects most PPO plans (the ones that give patients the most freedom to choose their doctor. They generally also have less out of pocket expenses for patients.) This will effectively relegate people to HMO types of plans with the least choice in doctors, higher out of pocket expenses and gatekeepers that require patients to have referrals to see specialists.

Obamacare was sold to Americans using smoke and mirrors. We only need to look at what has happened in Massachusetts to see the future: their healthcare costs have risen; despite mandates people game the system carrying coverage when they are ill while dropping it when they recover (getting far more out of the system then they are putting in); the waiting time to see doctors is longer; and because the system is losing money, reimbursement to providers and hospitals will drop. Obamacare sets up a system that is nothing but a transfer of wealth from the 99%  – this is not change that Americans should stand for. It can only be reversed if doctors and patients stop playing the game and move to a free market system that removes the corporate and government middle men. This can be accomplished by both patients and doctors re-entering a fee for service system based on pricing transparency, and movement by patients to catastrophic coverage.

Posted in Healthcare reform, Medical care, politics of medicine | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

A Doctor’s Opinion On The Supreme Court’s Decision On The Affordable Care Act

By upholding The Affordable Care Act, the Supreme Court has ignored the Constitution, and has confirmed what those who read the bill knew all along that the bill was a tax . In doing so they have placed corporate interests and profits along with government control above the needs of the doctor and the patient. This decision guarantees the destruction of the doctor patient relationship, and with it individualized healthcare, innovation and access while perpetuating the worse aspects of our medical system. Because of the mandate, Americans will be forced to pay for a system that will increase costs for patients, remove healthcare decisions from both the doctor and the patient, and lead to rationing thereby changing healthcare as we know it to a system based on one size fits all, cost controlled, conveyor belt socialized medicine. With this decision, it is clear that patient-centered medicine has effectively ended.

Posted in Press release | 12 Comments

More Money To Be Made On Sickness Than Health: Health Insurance Reform Does Not Equal Good Healthcare

The Affordable Care Act was sold to Americans as a way to overhaul healthcare. Many enticing promises were made to garner support. Politicians and pundits have both been selling the benefits of the law without understanding the difference between health insurance reform versus healthcare reform. It is true that the healthcare system is broken. Costs have risen to unacceptable levels. However, it is not because of doctors. The truth is because of a progressive decrease in reimbursements over the last 10-15 years doctors have become increasingly less of a factor. The true costs are driven by hospitals, the pharmaceutical industry, government regulations requiring compliance, and indirectly the food industry which is an important underlying factor in the explosion in the rise of chronic diseases such as obesity and diabetes. Unfortunately, Obamacare will do nothing to change these problems. In fact it has doubled down on the root cause of rising healthcare costs by giving more power to health insurance companies.

If the architects of ACA had bothered to ask practicing physicians what they thought, they would have been told that the fatal flaw of Obamacare was the belief that having health insurance equals having good healthcare. It is illogical to believe this when you consider that in order for a health insurance company to make a profit it has to take in as much money in premiums as possible while paying out as few claims as possible. The salaries of the CEOs of the various insurance companies suggest that the industry is doing an excellent job, and the way the bill was crafted it guarantees that the status quo will remain.

Despite all of the rhetoric of how wonderful Obamacare is, the fact is to date the bill has had the opposite effect:

  1. Instead of slowing and subsequently decreasing healthcare costs, in the two years since ACA was passed healthcare costs continue to rise in part due to the specific tenets of the bill. It is hard to argue that the bill was really designed to decrease costs when key tenets such as the inability to use the health savings account to buy over the counter medication or the possibility for patients to access cheaper drugs from outside the US exist.
  2. There has been acceleration in the consolidation of hospitals into larger systems at the cost of smaller community hospitals and independent outpatient surgery centers removing patient access to lower cost alternatives. Furthermore, the flow of money to hospitals tied to increasing government compliance mandates without requiring cost controls and pricing transparency have guaranteed continued astronomical healthcare costs (e.g., in some cases with hospital costs that are in some cases ten times more than what it costs to receive services in an outpatient facility such as a surgery center or independent radiology facility).
  3. The individual mandate, the most egregious portion of the bill, is for all intents and purposes a tax, and it will force Americans to support an insurance industry that routinely rations care by limiting access to care in the form of high deductibles, co-payments, pre-certifications, treatment restrictions (i.e., evidence based medicine), and outright denials. There was neither an attempt to reign in the abuse of patients by shifting costs and denying care to patients, nor to stop the interference with the doctors’ ability to practice sound medicine by providing the treatments that they and their patients deemed necessary.
  4. Access to doctors has decreased due to the flight of independent doctors from private practice into employed positions in large groups and hospitals, thereby moving patients into clinic settings with longer waiting time for appointments.
  5. The reliance on ‘best practices’ and evidence based medicine has lowered the standard of medicine by making it one size fits all. It has taken the power of healthcare away from the doctor and the patient and given it to the pharmaceutical industry. This has had the chilling effect of increasing healthcare costs while making the healthcare system one that is based on the management of chronic disease instead of wellness – a system that is inherently more expensive.
  6. Although you cannot be denied for having a pre-existing condition you can still be denied if the insurance company finds that you have lied on your application (even an inadvertent mistake can be considered a lie). More likely, an individual with a pre-existing condition may be priced out because of a high premium and/or deductible.

True healthcare reform means limiting the power of insurance companies not expanding it. Over the last two years insurance companies have actually made record profits because people have accessed their healthcare insurance less – having out of pocket expenses up to 10,000 for an individual policy in addition to paying a premium will do that. The truth is although it makes a great rallying point, nothing is for free. The implementation of Obamacare will cost patients more and they will receive less care. In short, the bill serves to further the very corporate interests (i.e., the insurance industry, the pharmaceutical industry, hospitals and the American Medical Association) that have inserted themselves between the doctor and the patient while raising healthcare costs. Instead of stopping this, ACA rewards them because there is more money to be made on sickness than on health.

Posted in Healthcare reform, Medical care, politics of medicine | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Obamacare and Appeasement: An Unholy Alliance

Republican members of Congress introduced healthcare legislation entitled “The patients’ Choice Act of 2009. As per one of the sponsors, Senator Burr: “The American health care system needs a complete transformation. The Patients’ Choice Act will finally enable Americans to own their health care instead of being trapped in the current system, which leaves people either uninsured, dependent on their employer, or forced into a government program. With a focus on prevention and wellness and covering those with pre-existing conditions, the Patients’ Choice Act will make health care affordable and accessible to all Americans.”

What Senator Burr and other members of Congress fail to recognize is that the healthcare system has been built on a foundation that favors the interests of the pharmaceutical industry, large hospitals, the American Medical Association, and the medical insurance industry. It has never represented the interests of doctors or patients. How could it, when the voice of corporate entities have been front and center in Congress in the form of lobbyists, campaign donations from special interest groups along with individual conflicts of interest which encourage members of Congress to continue to place their financial interests above the good of the country.

The Democrats and the Republicans are two sides of the same coin. The former want to control the individual by controlling their access to health by creating a government controlled grid that micro manages an individual’s access to care and choice of treatment options. The latter continues to pay lip service to free market initiatives while continually backsliding and refusing to introduce legislation that will provide a real alternative to Obamacare. Neither party has felt the need to ask the only group who really understands the problems with the healthcare system – the independent practicing physician.

Both parties have done a masterful job of demonizing the physician. The doctor has been the scapegoat for skyrocketing health care costs while giving even more power to the medical industry to those entities that have been the architects of the broken healthcare system that we have today. In short, the system is a complex network of corporate middlemen, that have worked tirelessly figuring out ways to skim profits while simultaneously shifting the costs to patients, rationing their care in the form of pre-certifications, increasing premiums, and outright denials on one hand while decreasing physician reimbursements (in the form of bundling of payments), lowering fees, implementing recovery audits to claw back reimbursements, and outright denials of payment after services have been rendered on the other. The government has exacerbated the problem by putting rules and regulations into place that encourage and reward this behavior, while ensuring that doctors and patients continue to feed a beast that needs increasingly more money in order to perpetuate a system that is based on the management of chronic disease instead of true prevention. It is no wonder that we are spending more money on healthcare and taking more medication, yet we as society are getting sicker.

If members of the Republican Party are serious about true healthcare reform they need to go back to the basics and remove mandates and regulations that do nothing to improve healthcare, but have actually caused the breakdown of our system.

  • Reform EMTALA (The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act), an unfunded congressional mandate passed in 1986, that required hospital emergency rooms to treat all patients regardless of their ability to pay. The unintended consequence of this bill has led to hospitals treating all patients regardless of their ability to pay and passing along the cost to those who are able to pay.

Instead: Require that patients who present to the emergency room be triaged and treated for real emergencies only, and not problems that are best treated in an outpatient office or clinic setting such as removal of ear wax.

  • Require that pharmacy benefit management companies (PBMs) be separate independent entities from insurance companies.

This will avoid collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and medical insurance companies that routinely manipulate the medication formulary based on profits not effectiveness.

  • Restrict unfair trade practices of large retail pharmacy chains that align with insurance companies as the “preferred” pharmacy for their members.

This practice cuts out small independent pharmacies because they cannot compete; and this destroys price control through honest competition.

  • Change the way hospitals are paid so that they cannot double dip. i.e., receive government payments to treat indigent patients while charging paying patients higher fees under the guise of ‘recouping their costs’ for treating indigent patients.

Instead: Bundle hospital fees into a single payment based on the patient’s disease, or surgical procedure.

  • Change the tax code

Allow physicians to write off delinquent patient bills as bad debt. This would alleviate the need to send the patient to collections and remove healthcare costs as a cause of bankruptcy. It would also encourage medical care that is gratis because physicians could afford to offer it.

  • Allow Medicare and Medicaid access to cheaper drugs from other countries.

Allow importation of drugs from Canada to decrease costs to both Medicare/Medicaid patients and the government.

  • Enact tort reform

Make patients who bring frivolous lawsuits responsible for paying all court costs.

It is only by completely overhauling the healthcare system to make it a level playing field that we will begin to truly lower the cost of healthcare while improving access, encouraging innovation, and changing our health care system from one that is disease driven to one based on wellness and prevention. It will not happen if we try appeasement as speaker Boehner proposes by keeping parts of Obamacare. Health care will only be what we want it to be in a free market system based on choice and competition.

Posted in Healthcare reform, Medical care, politics of medicine, Press release | Tagged , , , | 9 Comments

Obamacare Is A Trojan Horse For Socialized Medicine

Obamacare has become one of the most polarizing pieces of legislation ever passed. There was so much heat surrounding its passage that people got caught up and blinded by the rhetoric. On one hand, we were told that it had to be passed because uninsured people were practically dying in the streets, while greedy doctors were performing unnecessary tests, amputating feet, and taking out tonsils in their unending quest to make as much money as possible.

The initial premise that the problem with healthcare was because of the uninsured was a lie. Because of the emergency medical treatment and active labor act (EMTALA) passed in 1986, no one in this country whether a citizen or not can be denied healthcare. It was yet another congressional unfunded mandate that led to the unintended consequence of people using the emergency medical system for primary care. The explosion in the cost of hospital care grew out of their need to pass along the cost of delivering free health care and is one of the underlying engines which have driven the cost of healthcare through the roof.

Unfortunately, the uninsured meme was repeated by proponents of the bill and amplified by the corporate main stream media to such an extent that it became a “truth”. When you add the divide and conquer strategy of demonizing anyone who had questions, doubts or tried to apply critical reasoning (by attempting to muzzle them by using the race, class, and/or immigration card) to the deafening silence of providers on the front line, it is easy to see why we are where we are now.

We are on the brink of dropping into the global healthcare delivery system which is a system driven by rationing based on:

1.) Long waiting times leading to limited access to care.

2)   Limited access to medical innovation

3)   An emphasis on the management of chronic disease

4)   End of life decisions based on limited intervention with an emphasis on palliative care not curative care

If Michael Moore were honest in his film about socialized medical care in Europe, he would have told the audience that The National Healthcare system (NHS) in Britain is going bankrupt. It has considered hiring a German company to manage it, and recently had a hospital system taken over by a private management company. Furthermore, the NHS has changed the guidelines for treatment of diseases such as glaucoma and ventilation tubes for ear infections, and procedures like knee replacements making it more difficult for patients to qualify for the procedures.

It is even more galling that members of Congress, corporations like McDonald’s and Cigna Healthcare, and the Unions who were all proponents of the bill will not have to live under its yolk because they can either afford to pay for their healthcare or were granted an exemption by Kathleen Sebelius respectively – yet another example of rules that are applied unequally, by the folks who ‘know what is best for us’.

 What Obamacare accomplishes is not the delivery of efficient, affordable healthcare, but instead it is sets up of a complex system of top down control based on the creation of manufactured scarcity:

  1. Not enough doctors to deliver care
  2. Not enough hospitals to care for the 30 million more people who will access the system
  3. Mandates which lock patients into a system that strips away their choice while making them pay for the privilege
  4. Bureaucratic panels which micro manage the entire healthcare system while putting in  regulations that guarantee compliance in the face of penalties for those who dare to buck the system
  5. Prohibitive costs which are now admitted that are the outgrowth of the oversight needed to police this Draconian system.

This is a system that is unsustainable. It is a bankrupt system that has been funded under Obamacare  to get larger, more corrupt while perpetuating and rewarding the worst aspects of healthcare – One-size fits-all, corporate driven healthcare.

This is an example of the problem, reaction, solution paradigm

  1. Problem:  Once people realize what they will really be getting. They will realize it was not what they signed up for and there will be massive outrage
  2. Reaction: They will demand that the government to step in and fix it
  3. Solution: Universal healthcare

And there you have it – socialized medicine……but maybe that was the goal all along.

Posted in Medical care, politics of medicine, Press release | Tagged , , , , , | 8 Comments